GOVERNANCE_MAPPING: RESPONSIBILITY_MAPPING

Human Role Responsibility Mapping

Human Role Responsibility Mapping connects human roles to delegated authority, accepted outcome ownership, dispute ownership, remediation ownership, and cross-project reuse in AI agent systems.

BACK_TO: GOVERNANCE CONCEPT_CORE: AGENTIC LIFECYCLE GOVERNANCE AUTHORITY_SOURCE: GAIC WHITE PAPER
SUMMARY

Human Role Responsibility Mapping makes human authority visible before agents act and after outcomes are reviewed, disputed, remediated, reused, or closed.

Boundary statement

These pages provide author-analytical lifecycle governance mappings. They are not legal advice, legal compliance proof, certification, regulator-approved guidance, procurement recommendation, vendor ranking, or official standards-body guidance.

Lifecycle governance lens

The lifecycle lens asks which human or organizational role owns each responsibility state rather than treating human-in-the-loop as a generic checkpoint.

Key governance questions

  1. Who owns intent and active constraints?
  2. Who can delegate authority and approve consequential action?
  3. Who accepts, rejects, or escalates the outcome?
  4. Who owns disputes, rollback decisions, and remediation closure?
  5. Who owns cross-project reuse and evidence retention decisions?

Related lifecycle objects

Human RoleAgent RoleDelegated AuthorityAccepted Outcome OwnerDispute OwnerRemediation OwnerCross-Project Reuse Owner

RCCS-M / ALCS relevance

RCCS-M is relevant because human responsibility must be expressible as lifecycle objects. ALCS is relevant because human role ownership must stay coherent across delegation, execution, review, dispute, remediation, and closure.

Enterprise use

Enterprise teams can use this page to separate accountable role ownership from generic HITL, approval, or review language.

Source boundary

This page is an author-analytical responsibility-mapping guide and does not assign legal liability or employment responsibility.

WHITE_PAPER_SOURCE_TRACE DIRECT

White paper source trace

Human Role Responsibility Mapping is traced through GAIC's role-object MRO and lifecycle governance chapters.

The page maps human roles to MAS responsibility records without saying human-in-the-loop alone proves governance.

Use this mapping to ask which lifecycle object carries authority, evidence, accepted outcome, dispute, remediation, and closure for the governance question at hand.

This source trace is author-analytical. It is not legal advice, certification, legal compliance proof, regulator approval, vendor ranking, procurement guidance, or a claim that MPLP is required.

Chapter 4: Regulatory baseline Regulatory and standards-language context used as cautious mapping input. Chapter 5: Engineering objects Translation from governance language to lifecycle responsibility objects. Chapter 6: Missing Regulatory Objects The MRO object layer for authority, evidence, acceptance, substitution, and closure. RCCS-M MRO-adjusted regulatory coverage for lifecycle responsibility objects. ALCS Lifecycle conformance lens across intent, authority, evidence, acceptance, and closure. Publication boundary Non-legal, non-certification, non-ranking, and non-procurement boundary. MRO-01: Human role mapping Human-role-to-MAS responsibility mapping.
GAIC white paper hubMissing Regulatory ObjectsRCCS-MALCS